Robert Pimm

Home » Existential - and women » Spectre: another reason to miss it? Women. 4/10

Spectre: another reason to miss it? Women. 4/10

My most popular ever blog was called: Spectre: 5 reasons to miss it & 5 reasons you’ll see it 4/10.

A wise person commented thus:

“We thought a sixth reason to hate the film might be the completely useless portrayal of all women. The incredible number of perfectly coordinated outfit changes that the main Bond girl managed after leaving her workplace without any luggage was incredible. It also failed the Bechdel test.”

Lea

Lea Seydoux as Dr Madeleine Swann (Copyright: United Artists)

The casual sexism of most early Bond movies grates on many modern audiences, although some argue Skyfall was a notable exception.

Spectre (2015), too, has a nod or two towards equality.  The love interest, played by Lea Seydoux, is supposedly a doctor, although she spends more time pouting (21 minutes – I may have made that figure up) than healing (0 minutes – I’m pretty sure about that one).  In one scene she actually rescues Bond, who is about to be killed, by shooting top henchman Mr Hinx, although obviously she fails to hit any part of him that will seriously impair his villainousness.

But for most of the movie Spectre‘s gender politics remain utterly predictable.

You can debate how much this matters. Many people feel better seeing gender stereotypes reinforced, rather than challenged. But leaving aside the politics, stereotypes are boring – just like, tragically, far too much of Spectre.

An opportunity for originality and entertainment sacrificed for safety in a sea of sameness, if you ask me.

That Bechdel test, by the way, “asks whether a work of fiction features at least two women who talk to each other about something other than a man”.

Dykes_to_Watch_Out_For_(Bechdel_test_origin)

“Dykes to Watch Out For (Bechdel test origin)” by Alison Bechdel. 

According to Wikipedia, it first appeared in 1985 in Alison Bechdel’s comic strip Dykes To Watch Out For.  The test helps explore whether women are addressed in fiction in any depth – ie as human beings – or not.

Sounds a pretty good test to me, cf Simone de Beauvoir:

“Man is defined as a human being and a woman as a female — whenever she behaves as a human being she is said to imitate the male.”

Incidentally I was disappointed when one of my thrillers, Blood Summit, which initially got a great reception from Random House, was ultimately turned down because its action-packed female protagonist was, on reflection, “too much like a man”.

Discuss.

For: good to see Lea Seydoux at one point rescue Bond from imminent pulverisation.

Against: the rest of the time she is pouting helplessly.

P.S. if you enjoyed this review, you’re welcome to explore other writing on this site, starting with the sitemap and guide. Or try a taste of my “wonderful, feminist and dark” Hotel Stories.

Advertisements

Comments welcome

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to hear about new posts by email

Join 938 other followers

%d bloggers like this: